1998 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1992 Mazda 626

To start off, 1998 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 478 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.

Because 1998 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1992 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1992 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Bristol Blenheim 1992 Mazda 626
Make Bristol Mazda
Model Blenheim 626
Year Released 1998 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5898 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 0 HP 165 HP
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 84.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.9 mm 74 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1762 kg 1284 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2620 mm