1998 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 410 kg more than 1998 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (481 Nm). This means 1998 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Blenheim | SSR |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 481 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2950 mm |