1998 Buick LeSabre vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1998 Buick LeSabre is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1998 Buick LeSabre. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1998 Buick LeSabre.
Because 1989 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Buick LeSabre. (312 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Buick LeSabre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Buick LeSabre | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Buick | ZIL |
| Model | LeSabre | 4104 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 312 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 607 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 104.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 3890 mm |
