1998 Buick LeSabre vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Buick LeSabre (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 1998 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio. 1998 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 2007 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2007 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Buick LeSabre | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Buick | Renault |
Model | LeSabre | Clio |
Year Released | 1998 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |