1998 Buick Regal vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1998 Buick Regal is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Buick Regal weights approximately 194 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Buick Regal | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Buick | Studebaker |
Model | Regal | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |