1998 Buick Regal vs. 1989 Toyota Model F
To start off, 1998 Buick Regal is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Buick Regal (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Model F. (79 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Model F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Buick Regal weights approximately 194 kg more than 1989 Toyota Model F. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Toyota Model F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Model F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Buick Regal (312 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm). This means 1998 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Buick Regal | 1989 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Regal | Model F |
Year Released | 1998 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2240 mm |