1998 Buick Regal vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1998 Buick Regal is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Buick Regal (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Buick Regal weights approximately 404 kg more than 1992 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Buick Regal (312 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm). This means 1998 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216. 1998 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover 216 has manual transmission. 1992 Rover 216 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Buick Regal | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | Regal | 216 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |