1998 Buick Regal vs. 2006 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1998 Buick Regal. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 165 kg more than 1998 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Buick Regal. (312 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Buick Regal | 2006 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | Regal | XJ |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 560 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1659 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 84 L |