1998 Buick Regal vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Buick Regal (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (168 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 1336 kg more than 1998 Buick Regal.

Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (400 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Buick Regal. (312 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Buick Regal. 1998 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 2009 Mercedes-Benz C has manual transmission. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Buick Regal 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Buick Mercedes-Benz
Model Regal C
Year Released 1998 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2148 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 205 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 312 Nm 400 Nm
Engine Bore Size 96.5 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 88.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 17.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1494 kg 2830 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1450 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2770 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 62 L