1998 Buick Riviera vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 4,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1998 Buick Riviera. (125 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1998 Buick Riviera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Buick Riviera weights approximately 458 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Buick Riviera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Buick Riviera (287 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1998 Buick Riviera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Buick Riviera | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Riviera | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4130 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1666 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 132 L |