1998 Cadillac Catera vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1998 Cadillac Catera is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac Catera (200 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1998 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Cadillac Catera | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Catera | Cortina |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 58.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |