1998 Cadillac Catera vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Cadillac Catera is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 935 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac Catera | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | Catera | 102 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2160 mm |
