1998 Cadillac Catera vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1998 Cadillac Catera. (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 Cadillac Catera.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Cadillac Catera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Cadillac Catera.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Cadillac Catera | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | Catera | I-350 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |