1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 493 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | DeVille | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
