1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 765 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1600 mm |
