1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 626. (79 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 535 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 626 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4598 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1670 mm |