1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 665 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | DeVille | Camira |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
