1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 805 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1982 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | DeVille | XJR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1990 mm |
