1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (190 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 135 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | DeVille | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 5040 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1860 mm |
