1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1995 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 405 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 1995 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1700 mm |
