1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2002 Lincoln LS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Lincoln LS. (208 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 18 kg more than 2002 Lincoln LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | DeVille | LS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1870 mm |
