1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | DeVille | XJ |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4598 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1870 mm |