1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. (208 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 127 kg more than 1998 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | DeVille | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1832 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1990 mm |
