1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 255 kg more than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | DeVille | CLS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
