1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 338 kg more than 1998 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | DeVille | Commander |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4598 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1910 mm |
