1998 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 96 kg more than 2010 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 6 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4598 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1839 mm |