1998 Caterham C21 vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 1998 Caterham C21 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Caterham C21 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 500 kg more than 1998 Caterham C21.
Because 1998 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Caterham C21 | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Caterham | Lancia |
Model | C21 | Flavia |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |