1998 Caterham C21 vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Caterham C21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Caterham C21 (115 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Note weights approximately 402 kg more than 1998 Caterham C21.
Because 1998 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Caterham C21 | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Caterham | Nissan |
Model | C21 | Note |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2600 mm |