1998 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Astro. (183 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Astro | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Astro | UTE |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |