1998 Chevrolet Beretta vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Beretta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Beretta would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Beretta is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Beretta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Beretta | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Beretta | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2190 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1810 mm |
