1998 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1095 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Blazer | Smart |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2370 mm |
