1998 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Blazer. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 144 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (435 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Blazer. (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XF |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 435 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1771 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2920 mm |