1998 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer (196 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Blazer (349 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Blazer | Epica |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
