1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1941 Skoda Superb
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1941 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1941 Skoda Superb.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1941 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1941 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Camaro | Superb |
Year Released | 1998 | 1941 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3349 cc | 3137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3420 mm |