1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1033 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3349 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 63 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |
