1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 909 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Camaro | MK I |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2040 mm |