1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 636 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
Model | Camaro | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 25 L |