1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1969 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1084 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1969 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | Fronte |
Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 20 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 37 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 111 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 66 L |