1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1985 Chrysler Limousine
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Limousine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Limousine would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 124 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Limousine.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Limousine, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Limousine. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Limousine.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1985 Chrysler Limousine | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Camaro | Limousine |
Year Released | 1998 | 1985 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3330 mm |