1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 270 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Camaro | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1998 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |