1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 70.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2440 mm |
