1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 73 kg more than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (224 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Camaro | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 72 L |