1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2007 Mazda 3

To start off, 2007 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 233 kg more than 2007 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda 3. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Chevrolet Camaro 2007 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 3
Year Released 1998 2007
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3349 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L