1998 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Megane |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 80.5 mm |
Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |