1998 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1982 Zastava 750

To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Lumina (155 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 870 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Lumina (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750. 1998 Chevrolet Lumina has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Chevrolet Lumina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: