1998 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 254 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1959 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Malibu | 1959 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Malibu | Impala |
Year Released | 1998 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 3851 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3030 mm |