1998 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu (149 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 236 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Malibu | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 929 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2620 mm |