1998 Chevrolet Metro vs. 1962 DAF 600
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Metro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Metro (78 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Metro should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Metro weights approximately 300 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Metro (102 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Metro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Metro | 1962 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Metro | 600 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2060 mm |
