1998 Chevrolet Metro vs. 1989 Lada 2105
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Metro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Lada 2105 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Lada 2105 (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Metro. (53 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Lada 2105 should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Lada 2105 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Metro | 1989 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Metro | 2105 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2430 mm |