1998 Chevrolet Metro vs. 2006 Ford Ikon
To start off, 2006 Ford Ikon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Metro would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ikon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Metro (78 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ikon. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Metro should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ikon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ikon weights approximately 1926 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ikon (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Metro. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ikon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Metro | 2006 Ford Ikon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Metro | Ikon |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2580 mm |